Previous    Yeas   Nays  

Subject: BUSH AD
Date: 11/29/99

TRASH !!!!!!!!!

Subject: Punks like you will be held accoutable.
Date: 11/29/99

The day will come when punks like you will be held accountable.

Subject:
Date: 11/30/99

I just wanted to write and congratulate you on the absolute immaturity you have displayed by creating this website... It takes a big man to put his past behind him as our future president George W. Bush has. It takes a very small man to make fun of someone's past mistakes and try to cash in on it for 20 seconds of fame.It seems you have found your place in life, insulting others for your own benefit. Congratulations I guess you have found your place in life. As for George W. bush his place will be leading our country into a new millennium. Bringing with him tough drug laws and a renewed sense of morals, all of which our current so called leader has fought against. I look forward to having a president I will be proud to tell my children about instead of trying to explain away the mistakes of our current president. When you get over yourself and this website is revealed for it's total immaturity, maybe then you realize how stupid you look. Take Care, Tamara

Subject: Vote-2000
Date: 11/30/99

I dont care who runs on the GOP ticket in (2000) I will vote with my family, friends and church (100%) GOP!!!!Anything but AL BORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!My God people do you want (4) more years of those Pic & Pac!!!!!!!!!!! Rev. Michael

Subject: you are a sick person!!!
Date: 11/30/99

Your computer is processing nothing but trash and not truth. To think I served in the Korean War to help keep sick people like around. This type of trashing is sick and should'nt be allowed on the Internet.

If you don't have anything good to say just don't say anything. This will keep America beautiful.

George

Subject: Put up or shut up
Date: 11/30/99

Parody is one thing, slander is another. As far as I can tell from reading the voluminous press coverage on the subject, the "cocaine question" resulted from a rumor. The source of this rumor is unknown (Gee, can you think of one or two people who might have started this?). If you have proof of drug use, then produce it. You also say that big business has contributed the 70 million to Bush's campaign. That, also, is not true. Although business interests have contributed to Bush's campaign, most of the money has come from small contributors in donations of $1,000 or less.

Lastly, I understand that you claim to be an "independant". Pardon me, sir, if I take that with a very large grain of salt.

James

Subject: George Bush site
Date: 11/30/99

Where is your Clinton site? Bill or Hillary?

Subject: (no subject)
Date: 11/30/99

This site is a disgrace. Bush is a very good candidate and it is very sad to see the commies of this country trying to bring him down.



-- S

Subject: limits to freedom
Date: 11/30/99

I recently have read a number of your articles on gwbuxh.com. Somehow, I fail to see any humor in any of them. They unquestionably appear to be libel. You cannot claim that these postings are protected by the First Amendment, unless you can prove that they are truthful. Can you? Mr Bush whould have no problem proving malice, which is the only standard a political figure must prove to succeed in a libel case which cannot be proven truthful by its author. You gave Bush that proof by your on-;ine request for funds to publish more libelous materials against him.

Also, you seem quite eager to make something of his comment on there needing to be limits to freedom. Do you disagree with that? That would imply that you believe we should abandon laws against theft and murder. If someone wanted to kill someone, no one should limit his freedom to do so. If someone wnated to steal from others, no son should limit his freedom to do so. I guess that means child molesting and pedofilia also must be legalized. If you really believe these things, I can easily see why you are a Democrat and cannot tolerate an honerable Republican.

LMC

Subject: Disgraceful
Date: 11/30/99

It's amazing how you can't challenge him on the issues, so you have to attack him personally. What ethically challenged individual started this piece of garbage web-site? What left-wing, Clinton loving, tree hugging, welfare supporting, high-tax loving, free-spending liberal started this awful, disgraceful nonsense?

You should be ashamed !



Subject:
Date: 11/30/99

This is an idiotic website. It is hilarious to see liberals so scared of one man who can defeat all the other candidates. Get ready to play HAIL TO THE CHIEF PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN 2000. Read it and weep!

Subject: What?!
Date: 11/30/99

Your website speaks for itself. You call Bush names in the name of Bush. Sounds like your goal is to deceve people into believing your lies. You know that no one would even be logging into this sight if Bush were not so popular with the people. You sound like a sore loser to me..........To each his own

Subject: your website
Date: 11/30/99

Do you think it's good to spread lies? Thanks, Bobby

Subject: your site sucks
Date: 11/28/99

This is a really terrible site. You obviously have no computer skills to build such a worthless site. My 12 year old brother has a better website than you losers. phil

Subject: Zack Exley
Date: 11/29/99

It is suggested you start looking over your shoulder, you moron.

Subject: Ridiculous
Date: 11/29/99

Congratulations!

You have reached the pinnacle of National Enquirer status. We need serious facts and serious debate on the issues in this campaign, not unfounded rumor and outright misinformation. It's because of people like you that challenges to our freedom of expression are given serious dialogue. Shame on you!

Subject: Low life
Date: 11/29/99

You are one low life Mother F***er and I hope someone takes you to court. Your site is not funny. It must be rough being married to your sister or was it your mother married to her brother.

Subject: Responsibility
Date: 11/29/99

As a neutral voter, I have to say I'm disappointed by your web sight. It goes too far. I know I'm not the only one who disagrees, but I disagree for another reason. I don't like Bush, but your wed sight is actually going to promote him. It's a good bet that the 50,000,000 Americans who are on the internet are generally more educated, an not the mindless readers of the "Inquirer" or "Star" magazine. As an educated person, I look at your exaggerated statements, and assume they are false, because they don't contain the most important part of free speech, "Responsibility." IF THE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, YOU CAN SLANT THEM ANY WAY YOU WANT. However, you don't offer any evidence of you statements.

With free speech comes responsibility. A responsibility to the society we live in. When you degrade an demean without sufficient proof you lower the quality of your news, and truth becomes whatever you want it to be. When truth isn't truth any more, "THAT IS WHEN FREE SPEECH IS IN JEOPARDY." Be responsible and more of us will listen.

A citizen

Dan


Subject:
Date: 11/29/99

It must suck spending all your time bashing a man who is running for president. Especially a man who will win and become the next president of the United States. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone". -JBK

Subject: Your parody (?)
Date: 11/29/99

Gentlemen --

You guys have hit a new low....is James Carville your attack dog now? Next time Dems whine about Pizza Hut with Hillary we can all recall this vicious and cruel stab at George' s character. I don't see GWB or his people using these tactics. He's really above all this crap.

P.Walter

Subject: limits to freedom
Date: 11/29/99

Dear Zack:

OF COURSE freedom has its limits! To give the most elementary example, your freedom to swing your fist ends at the other fellow's nose. I think you're guilty of sound-bite logic on this one.

As for your appropriation of Mr. Bush's name for your private purposes, that should be enjoinable under the common law -- for the same reason you can't sell "Bill Clinton Cigars." You simply do not have the right to use another person's name or likeness for your personal or business pursuits. That's been the law for decades in the non-Internet arena. It's only a matter of time until it is made clear that the same principles apply to the Internet.

Finally, if you are concerned about freedom of speech and constitutional rights, why are you plastering pictures of Sen. McCain on your Web site? If he (and the junior senator from my state) gets his way on campaign finance "reform," the ability of individuals to participate in the election process will be limited, leaving the mass media -- who are constantly guilty of bias and sound-bite depth to their reporting -- with even more power to frame the issues and influence the public. Sen. McCain is no friend of the Bill of Rights!

John


Subject: Now we know
Date: 11/29/99

>From a quick glance at your disgusting web page, now we know who else can't spell.

Rick ӿ�

Subject: (no subject)
Date: 11/29/99

This is the most shameless website ever. Your savior Al Gore doesn't stand a chance so you try to tear down Bush. Why don't you stick your website up your candyass!

Subject: Truthfully:
Date: 11/29/99

If the choice came down to dubbya or Al Gore, I'd plug my nose and vote for George W.the Crown prince junior. Hopefully, if the Texas fool is nominated, maybe his dad will take over ......( ?) So Senator John McCain has a temper: GOOD! Finally, somebody with a backbone for a change.

Subject: gwbush
Date: 11/29/99

If you're going to have a web page to "tell the truth" you should start with the fact that the $70M raised by Bush is all made up of $1000 limited donations. That means at least 70,000 individuals/businesses are supporting Bush, while less than 10,000 are supporting McCain. Tell the truth please.

Jim

Subject:
Date: 11/29/99

why didn't you do a web site like this when clinton admitted perjury in a federal sexual harrassment case, instead of this rumor about bush?

Subject: The real story.
Date: 11/29/99

The hypocrisy in modern politics is that groups like you radical leftist only see problems with Republicans. Clinton raped a woman, but nothing is said. Clinton used coke, witnessed by several people, but nothing is said. Clinton orders nations bombed and rocketed, goes to war, kills thousands of poor people, makes thousands of people homeless and all to divert attention from his sleazy administration. Is there any outrage? No. How in the fuck can you sleep at night? Is there no limit to the suffering you will put up with in order to cover Clinton's evil, fat ass?

Subject:
Date: 11/29/99

Inevitably, the names of those who support you will end up in the hands of the Bush people, thus supplying them with another enemies list which they can use to persecute their opponents.

Subject: You're an gold digging fool!
Date: 11/29/99



Subject: Left wing political hack or extorsion?
Date: 11/29/99

Hey Zack,

You sound like a lefty hack. You're giving free speech and Internet freedom a bad name. Why don't you just go out and campaign for Gore.

If you deny political reasons for this site, I'd suspect you're trying to extort money from the Bush campaign to make you go away. I hope they continue to tell you to fuck-off.

I wholeheartedly agree with your right to free speech. You should say whatever you want about anyone-but under your own name. If there is any justice, the courts will end this type of crap quickly, much to the dismay of people really interested in freedom on the Internet, rather than a quick buck or a political cheap shot. What you're doing really sucks.

Bill

Subject: Fw: Young and stupid at 29...Sad Zack Exley
Date: 11/29/99

Stupid - Although I have precious little time to muse over the crap generated by people who've gained a measure of mastery of the English language, but not over its pieces taken in combination.... a.. You want my attention...and you've done nothing of significance in areas that matter. b.. You, like so many unable to create, are more than willing to critique the work of anyone who can. c.. You would crucify anyone who has committed the most insignificant error...long after it makes absolutely no difference. And on a basis that you likely couldn't pass muster. (Who's a hypocrite?) d.. You would extend the logic that says that since one man eventually showed that he was capable of good things, even though he made a misstep, we should not try to control such behaviour at all...Hell, let the old folks who are foolish enough to work hard and play by the rules suffer. Right? Why don't you wait until you actually have lived long enough to know something, long enough to have some sort of valid perspective before you begin to sound off? No one with the brains God gave a goatee really wants to see your crap! I'm not a G.W. Bush supporter. I am a supporter of orderly, civilized behaviour that gives each person an equal opportunity to make his vote...and only his vote...count. I'll vote for someone who has accomplished something beyond disrupting the efforts of folks who are willing to work.

Subject: Bush
Date: 11/29/99

Bush's comment that there should be a limitation on freedoms is nothing more than a re-statement of the facts and the law. Freedom is not unlimited. The Supreme Court has, to give only two examples, illustrated this: 1) No one has the right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater, and 2) Justice Holmes proclaimed: "Your right to swing your arms (fists) ends where my nose begins". For you to say that Bush made a fool of himself with the statement reveals your ignorance of the constitution, and its interpretations. Don't get into areas where your stupidity can be immediately highlighted and identified. judgejr